[tei-council] Fall F2F scheduling followup

[Peter Stadler]

Ok, so that’s ruled out. The only other possible date I can see is October 15-17, but there is a „no“ from Elli. If that’s still a „no“ I think we have to stick with Nov. 5-7 finally?!

Best
Peter

Am 18.06.2014 um 13:05 schrieb James Cummings <James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk>:

> 
> Sorry, I've got a solid, booked, and paid-for previous commitment 
> mon/tues/weds that week back here in the UK.
> 
> -James
> 
> 
> On 17/06/14 18:42, Fabio Ciotti wrote:
>> Hi All, I can retract my unavailability for Oct. 29-31 if there is the
>> chance to make just one transoceanic flight. And above all because of
>> the chance to be in a US University Campus during Halloween night:
>> damn, this is really part of my imaginary, probably I will go out
>> hoping to meet Michael Myers or Freddy Krueger :-).
>> I gave a look at doodle, and now the decision is up to Elly
>> (disposable only if necessary) and principally to James, our Chair,
>> since he stated he could not in those days.
>> 
>> Fabio
>> 
>> 2014-06-11 13:55 GMT+02:00 Hugh Cayless <philomousos at gmail.com>:
>>> You were one of the three who said they couldn't make it then, so that
>>> leaves two :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The 29th to 31st oct would certainly suit me a lot better than the 5-7
>>>> nov, as  I will probably be in Chicago till the 26th anyway.  But if I'm
>>>> the only one who feels that way I'll shut up, and join you by skype on
>>>> the 5th.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/06/14 16:01, Hugh Cayless wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> 
>>>>> There was some question of whether the F2F could be moved back a week, so
>>>>> it followed on right after the Annual Meeting. We had open the slot
>>>> October
>>>>> 29-31, the following week, but three of us marked it as impossible and
>>>> one
>>>>> as iffy. That's the latter part of the week. I'll be running a marathon
>>>> on
>>>>> Sunday the 26th, so I really can't manage the beginning of the week. The
>>>>> slot we picked was the earliest one everybody agreed on. Do we want to
>>>>> revisit that decision?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hugh
>>>> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20140620/5a23470e/attachment.bin