[tei-council] add idno to att.canonical?

[Lou Burnard]

On 24/02/14 11:28, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2014, at 11:07, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> because some authory files have ids and also URIs and they are sometimes different, e.g. the BNF catalogue
> coo, thats well bonkers.
>
> one might say you should have two <idno>, one
> for the shelf mark in the BNF, another for the URI.

One did. But the client says no, that's not the way they see things at 
the BNF.

The content of the <idno> is a URI leading to an entry in the authority 
file. That entry may have a a different "canonical" URI as its content. 
It's exactly analogous to @ref on <person>