[tei-council] Re : VOTE ON DEPRECATION WORDING (was "Re: Next TEI-C Guidelines Release (presumably 2.6.0)")

[Lou Burnard]

I share the consensus in favoyr If d. Which.cpuld  be improved by removing " from the tei" since i dont know what it means
Envoy¨¦ depuis mon HTC

----- Reply message -----
De : "James Cummings" <James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk>
Pour : "tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU" <tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU>
Objet : [tei-council] VOTE ON DEPRECATION WORDING (was "Re: Next TEI-C Guidelines Release (presumably 2.6.0)")
Date : mer., janv. 8, 2014 13:50



d, c, b, a as well.

-James

On 08/01/14 04:03, Syd Bauman wrote:
>>> [xslt] WARNING: use of deprecated attribute ¨D The TEI-C may drop
>>> support for @type of the biblScope element as early as 2014-12-17.
>
> SR> Which reminds me that I (still) don't like the vague wording of this.
>
> OK folks, time to stand up and be counted. We've had 4 alternate
> suggestions for the wording of the "you used a deprecated doohicky"
> message. Please vote for one, or put them in your preference order, or
> (ack!) suggest another wording ASAP.
>
> a. The TEI-C may drop support for relationGrp element as early as
>     2014-06-17
>
> b. The TEI-C will drop support for the relationGrp element after
>     2014-06-17
>
> c. The relationGrp element will be removed from TEI source code on
>     2014-06-17, and will not be available in any P5 releases after
>     that date.
>
> d. The relationGrp element will be removed from the TEI on 2014-06-17
>
>
> Note: the value of validUntil= does not have to be a complete date. If
> it is precise only to the month, we'd replace "on DATE" with "in
> DATE". Perhaps even convert 2014-06 to "June 2014".
>


--
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Academic IT Services, University of Oxford
--
tei-council mailing list
tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived