[tei-council] VOTE ON DEPRECATION WORDING (was "Re: Next TEI-C Guidelines Release (presumably 2.6.0)")

[Hugh Cayless]

I like the simplicity of D (even though it’s not technically true; C is more accurate but I agree with Fabio, too wordy). Being definitive will help concentrate people’s attention, so:

D, B, C, A

Hugh

/**
 *  Hugh A. Cayless, Ph.D
 *  hugh.cayless at duke.edu
 *  Duke Collaboratory for Classics Computing (DC3)
 *  http://blogs.library.duke.edu/dcthree/
**/


On Jan 7, 2014, at 23:03 , Syd Bauman <s.bauman at neu.edu> wrote:

>>> [xslt] WARNING: use of deprecated attribute ― The TEI-C may drop
>>> support for @type of the biblScope element as early as 2014-12-17.
> 
> SR> Which reminds me that I (still) don't like the vague wording of this.
> 
> OK folks, time to stand up and be counted. We've had 4 alternate
> suggestions for the wording of the "you used a deprecated doohicky"
> message. Please vote for one, or put them in your preference order, or
> (ack!) suggest another wording ASAP.
> 
> a. The TEI-C may drop support for relationGrp element as early as
>   2014-06-17
> 
> b. The TEI-C will drop support for the relationGrp element after
>   2014-06-17
> 
> c. The relationGrp element will be removed from TEI source code on
>   2014-06-17, and will not be available in any P5 releases after
>   that date.
> 
> d. The relationGrp element will be removed from the TEI on 2014-06-17
> 
> 
> Note: the value of validUntil= does not have to be a complete date. If
> it is precise only to the month, we'd replace "on DATE" with "in
> DATE". Perhaps even convert 2014-06 to "June 2014".
> -- 
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived