[tei-council] FR 474

[James Cummings]

I added an example to @ref on att.canonical for FR 474 as 
actioned at the last F2F. However, see my latest comment on:

https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/474/#b44c

There is a remark following the definition of @ref that says:
===
The value must point directly to one or more XML elements by 
means of one or more URIs, separated by whitespace. If more than 
one is supplied, the implication is that the name identifies 
several distinct entities.
===

I would suggest that saying it 'must point directly to one or 
more XML elements' is incorrect and goes against other examples 
in the Guidelines (e.g. we use persName/@ref to point to wikipedia).

If anyone has some suggested rephrasings of this remark, I'd 
appreciate it if they added them to the ticket.

-James

-- 
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Academic IT Services, University of Oxford