[tei-council] build failure

[Kevin Hawkins]

On 12/13/2013 8:31 AM, Syd Bauman wrote:
>> so the warnings in ValidatorLog.xml are not intended?
>> (there seem to be many versions of the same message, by the way)
>
> No, intended, in some sense of the word. (I.e., it is a different
> ticket item to take care of these warnings, and we may want to do so
> ASAP or we may want to do so closer to deprecation-death date.) And,
> as you've gathered by now, a warning is flagged every time a
> deprecated feature is used in an example.

Right, as in the other thread, these deprecated practices have been 
hanging around the Guidelines, and we only now noticed them now that Syd 
has implemented this check.

>> by the way, the wording "The TEI-C may drop support for the
>> relationGrp element as early as 2014-06-17” seems a bit odd. why
>> the vagueness? why not "The TEI-C will drop support for the
>> relationGrp element after 2014-06-17"
>
> Good question. I thought we were trying to be vague :-) What wording
> would people like? (In retrospect, since we don't have multilingual
> error message support (yet), it should be as simple as reasonable.)

Our practice in 
http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/Council/Working/tcw27.xml is to remove 
the practice after the date in @validUntil, but the public won't really 
see it till the following release.  Syd's wording is cumbersome though 
implies that we won't remove it the day after, but I agree that 
Sebastian's is clearer.

--Kevin