[tei-council] proof of concept of i18n work

[Lou Burnard]

On 17/11/13 21:35, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2013, at 21:25, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> I think it would be more sensible to trawl through the valDescs for any
>> that are actually useful before doing any work on dating them.
>>
>> I strongly suspect the number is very small indeed -- most of them are a
>> hangover from the days before we had datatyping
> it may be more than you think, over 150. But I agree, many are redundant
> nowadays.
> --

I will volunteer to go through killing all of them, if you like. I've 
had a look and so far I don't see any that are not either redundant 
(e.g. " the name of a module" for attDef/@module duh ) or contain vague 
mutterings that should be transferred to <remarks> or zapped.