[tei-council] 2.4.1 or 2.5.0?

[Gabriel Bodard]

That's how I interpret it to, but some people interpret the words in 
att.scoping, "within the context of the element bearing this attribute" 
as meaning the context is the `<precision>` element, not its parent. 
(This is confused by the fact that it explicitly says the context is the 
parent element if both @match and @target attributes are omitted.)

I agree with Lou, but I think the wording could be improved on 
att.scoping (and therefore the example there fixed as well).

On 2013-07-24 15:40, Lou Burnard wrote:
> No, wait, why do we think it's wrong as it is?
>
> See definition for @match on att.ranging -- it says that if only @match
> is preent, the context is the parent element, which in the second
> example would be <date>
>
> On 24/07/13 15:38, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> So wait, I'm fixing the example from saying match="@notBefore" to saying
>> match="../@notBefore"?
>>
>> (The opposite of what you told me to correct it to on the ticket?)
>>
>> On 2013-07-24 15:37, James Cummings wrote:
>>> On 24/07/13 15:32, Hugh Cayless wrote:
>>>> Should you also fix the example that's in there now, and has an incorrect @match?
>>> Yes, if you (Gabby), could fix the example (especially if adding
>>> an additional one) that'd be good.
>>>
>>>
>>> -James
>>>
>>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:29 , Gabriel Bodard <gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Okay done. As I note on the ticket, I agree with Lou that discussion of
>>>>> these attributes is needed in the guidelines, and I haven't had time to
>>>>> add that. (And I dare say won't before Friday.) I leave the ticket open
>>>>> as it remains a priority.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we maybe include Thomas Carlson's example in the elementSpec, as
>>>>> a start? That seems safe enough...
>>>>>
>>>>> G
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-07-24 15:22, James Cummings wrote:
>>>>>> I guess I don't mind if Gabby commits the change quickly. As
>>>>>> Sebastian is doing the release on Friday that leaves us all
>>>>>> tomorrow for extra proofreading!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sebastian is on holiday today and thursday, so probably
>>>>>> can't/won't comment and is planning to do the release on Friday.
>>>>>>       This leaves plenty of time for people to point out errors in
>>>>>> the generation of the outputs. Martin can attest that I made good
>>>>>> with my promise of a Tunnock's dark chocolate covered caramel
>>>>>> wafer last time for finding lots of typos. (In case that
>>>>>> encourages you!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last release we noticed, during the release period, that a typo
>>>>>> meant the links to the translated versions on the index.html
>>>>>> pages were broken (fixed during release).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please do have a look at the outputs at
>>>>>> http://bits.nsms.ox.ac.uk:8080/jenkins/ and under
>>>>>> http://bits.nsms.ox.ac.uk:8080/jenkins/job/TEIP5/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/release/
>>>>>> and check that all web pages work as expected, all the schemas
>>>>>> and generated content do what they are supposed to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -James
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24/07/13 14:39, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>>>>>>> I think if we do 2.4.1 this week (as it now seems), then 2.5.0 should
>>>>>>> wait until the next cycle, probably at the end of the year--when we'll
>>>>>>> have a bunch of new interesting things to include, as well as just
>>>>>>> correcting the oversight in `<precision>`.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There's still stuff to talk about re responsibility, relation and match,
>>>>>>> for example.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> G
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2013-07-24 13:40, Syd Bauman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Well, this is a moot point as we're now frozen and it's not in. But
>>>>>>>> FWIW, I think both GB and LB are right, so I'm in favor of
>>>>>>>> a) adding att.ranging to <precision>, and
>>>>>>>> b) not doing so now, so we can make sure the examples and discussion
>>>>>>>>          make sense, and consider deprecating @degree
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We can make a 2.5.0 release in a week or two, eh?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dr Gabriel BODARD
>>>>> Researcher in Digital Epigraphy
>>>>>
>>>>> Digital Humanities
>>>>> King's College London
>>>>> Boris Karloff Building
>>>>> 26-29 Drury Lane
>>>>> London WC2B 5RL
>>>>>
>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
>>>>> E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
>>>>> http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> tei-council mailing list
>>>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>>>
>>>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Digital Humanities
King's College London
Boris Karloff Building
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/