[tei-council] 2.4.1 or 2.5.0?

[Gabriel Bodard]

So wait, I'm fixing the example from saying match="@notBefore" to saying 
match="../@notBefore"?

(The opposite of what you told me to correct it to on the ticket?)

On 2013-07-24 15:37, James Cummings wrote:
> On 24/07/13 15:32, Hugh Cayless wrote:
>> Should you also fix the example that's in there now, and has an incorrect @match?
>
> Yes, if you (Gabby), could fix the example (especially if adding
> an additional one) that'd be good.
>
>
> -James
>
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:29 , Gabriel Bodard <gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Okay done. As I note on the ticket, I agree with Lou that discussion of
>>> these attributes is needed in the guidelines, and I haven't had time to
>>> add that. (And I dare say won't before Friday.) I leave the ticket open
>>> as it remains a priority.
>>>
>>> Should we maybe include Thomas Carlson's example in the elementSpec, as
>>> a start? That seems safe enough...
>>>
>>> G
>>>
>>> On 2013-07-24 15:22, James Cummings wrote:
>>>> I guess I don't mind if Gabby commits the change quickly. As
>>>> Sebastian is doing the release on Friday that leaves us all
>>>> tomorrow for extra proofreading!
>>>>
>>>> Sebastian is on holiday today and thursday, so probably
>>>> can't/won't comment and is planning to do the release on Friday.
>>>>     This leaves plenty of time for people to point out errors in
>>>> the generation of the outputs. Martin can attest that I made good
>>>> with my promise of a Tunnock's dark chocolate covered caramel
>>>> wafer last time for finding lots of typos. (In case that
>>>> encourages you!)
>>>>
>>>> Last release we noticed, during the release period, that a typo
>>>> meant the links to the translated versions on the index.html
>>>> pages were broken (fixed during release).
>>>>
>>>> Please do have a look at the outputs at
>>>> http://bits.nsms.ox.ac.uk:8080/jenkins/ and under
>>>> http://bits.nsms.ox.ac.uk:8080/jenkins/job/TEIP5/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/release/
>>>> and check that all web pages work as expected, all the schemas
>>>> and generated content do what they are supposed to.
>>>>
>>>> -James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 24/07/13 14:39, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>>>>> I think if we do 2.4.1 this week (as it now seems), then 2.5.0 should
>>>>> wait until the next cycle, probably at the end of the year--when we'll
>>>>> have a bunch of new interesting things to include, as well as just
>>>>> correcting the oversight in `<precision>`.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's still stuff to talk about re responsibility, relation and match,
>>>>> for example.
>>>>>
>>>>> G
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-07-24 13:40, Syd Bauman wrote:
>>>>>> Well, this is a moot point as we're now frozen and it's not in. But
>>>>>> FWIW, I think both GB and LB are right, so I'm in favor of
>>>>>> a) adding att.ranging to <precision>, and
>>>>>> b) not doing so now, so we can make sure the examples and discussion
>>>>>>        make sense, and consider deprecating @degree
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can make a 2.5.0 release in a week or two, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr Gabriel BODARD
>>> Researcher in Digital Epigraphy
>>>
>>> Digital Humanities
>>> King's College London
>>> Boris Karloff Building
>>> 26-29 Drury Lane
>>> London WC2B 5RL
>>>
>>> T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
>>> E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
>>> http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
>>>
>>> --
>>> tei-council mailing list
>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>
>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>
>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Digital Humanities
King's College London
Boris Karloff Building
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/