[tei-council] 2.4.1 or 2.5.0?

[Gabriel Bodard]

I think if we do 2.4.1 this week (as it now seems), then 2.5.0 should 
wait until the next cycle, probably at the end of the year--when we'll 
have a bunch of new interesting things to include, as well as just 
correcting the oversight in `<precision>`.

There's still stuff to talk about re responsibility, relation and match, 
for example.

G

On 2013-07-24 13:40, Syd Bauman wrote:
> Well, this is a moot point as we're now frozen and it's not in. But
> FWIW, I think both GB and LB are right, so I'm in favor of
> a) adding att.ranging to <precision>, and
> b) not doing so now, so we can make sure the examples and discussion
>     make sense, and consider deprecating @degree
>
> We can make a 2.5.0 release in a week or two, eh?
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Digital Humanities
King's College London
Boris Karloff Building
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/