[tei-council] listRelation membership in model.biblLike

[Lou Burnard]

Alternatively, we could add it to model.global.meta (which is probly 
where it should be) . Though it still wouldnt be available in 
<biblStruct> even then.


On 14/06/13 16:03, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 14 Jun 2013, at 12:56, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>
>   wrote:
>> "For clarity, the new <listRelation> element (which would contain
>> <relation> elements) would be allowed in the same places as the
>> to-be-deprecated <relationGrp> except that it would also be added to
>> model.biblLike so that bibl, biblStruct, and biblFull could contain
>> <relation> elements without needing to wrap these <relation> elements in
>> <relationGrp>."
>>
>> If the intent is (as I think this comment suggests) to allow <relation>
>> within <bibl> and friends, then clearly adding it to model.biblLike
>> won't cut it: the relevant class would be model.biblPart. I think that's
>> a corrigible error and I propose to corridge it, unless there is strong
>> objection.
> That doesn't solve the problem, as it misses out the " and friends" clause.
> But I agree, its better than nothing, and probably what Kevin asked for.
>
> See if it breaks anything….
>
>> It leaves aside the broader question as to where else <relation>, or
>> <relationGrp> elements should be permitted. That probably needs a
>> separate and longer discussion.
>
> true
>
>
> roll on /TEI/linkedData
> --
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Director (Research) of Academic IT
> University of Oxford IT Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>