[tei-council] Example of <app> with multiple <lem>s

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 14 Jun 2013, at 12:44, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> 
> I don't think <rdgGrp> should be permitted to have multiple <lem> (direct) children, both because it makes no sense and because it would then be different from <app>, for which (in the passage I quoted in my previous mail on this topic) it occasionally substitutes.
> 
> So I would vote for removing the constraint, and possibly tweaking the content model of <rdgGroup>

can you suggest changes to the model, then? why is the second part of it zeroOrMore?

 <group xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0">
      <oneOrMore>
        <choice>
          <group>
            <ref name="rdgGrp"/>
            <optional>
              <ref name="wit"/>
            </optional>
          </group>
          <zeroOrMore>
            <group>
              <optional>
                <group>
                  <ref name="lem"/>
                  <optional>
                    <ref name="wit"/>
                  </optional>
                </group>
              </optional>
              <group>
                <ref name="model.rdgLike"/>
                <optional>
                  <ref name="wit"/>
                </optional>
              </group>
            </group>
          </zeroOrMore>
        </choice>
      </oneOrMore>
    </group>
--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Director (Research) of Academic IT
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431