[tei-council] listRelation membership in model.biblLike

[Martin Holmes]

 From its first introduction (which I think you did), <listRelation> has 
always been a member of model.biblLike:

<http://sourceforge.net/p/tei/code/9870/tree/trunk/P5/Source/Specs/listRelation.xml>

This was by analogy with <relationGrp>, which it was replacing. 
<relationGrp> was added to model.biblLike at rev 9707 by Sebastian:

r9707 | rahtz | 2011-11-09 03:46:08 -0800 (Wed, 09 Nov 2011) | 1 line

make <relation> take @key/@ref (att.canonical) and put <relationGrp> in 
model.biblLike. TEI FR 3309894 refers


That's now FR 310:

<http://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/310/>

and it was done "so that bibl, biblStruct, and biblFull could contain 
<relation> elements without needing to wrap these <relation> elements in 
<relationGrp>."

Cheers,
Martin



On 13-06-04 01:43 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> Looking at an unrelated  ticket, I have just noticed that <listRelation>
> (along with the deprecated <relationGrp> which it replaces) is a member
> of model.biblLike.
> Can someone please remind me why? It's not remotely bibliographic, and
> it will look very odd in most places where other members of the class
> appear e.g. inside a <listBibl>
>
>

-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)