[tei-council] stamps

[Paul F. Schaffner]

I have to admit that this is the first time I've even looked
at <stamp>. Which I suppose means that I have no vested interest.
It could almost be regarded as a specialized form of <figure>
in that a stamp (used in a transcriptional context) could theoretically
contain almost anything, and could be used almost anywhere from a
<note> to (perhaps most commonly) a stamped signature. Still, it's
hard to justify a lot of the current content model ({kinesic}? ),
and if there's a ready fix that allows the reasonable contents, including
{desc}, I can't quickly think of any objections. pfs

On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Martin Holmes wrote:

> Makes sense to me, as long as we don't invalidate anything currently
> allowed which might have been used. In your new content model, what will
> be excluded which was allowed before?
>
> Cheers
> Martin
>
> On 13-04-25 12:20 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> Could someone take a look at
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/450/
>>
>> I have a project which needs the fix proposed here -- anyone object to
>> me just applying it?
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>
>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schaffner | PFSchaffner at umich.edu | http://www.umich.edu/~pfs/
316-C Hatcher Library N, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109-1190
--------------------------------------------------------------------