[tei-council] Sourceforge Upgrade

[Gabriel Bodard]

Wouldn't it be polite to give TEI-L advance warning as well, so that 
people whose services depend on TEI repo (such as the EpiDoc 
guidelines), know to be on standby to fix stuff?

On 2013-03-12 17:43, James Cummings wrote:
>
> In that case does anyone have any final reservations that I
> should not do this *tomorrow* Wednesday 13 March?
>
> I will take silence as assent and proceed tomorrow if I don't
> hear cries of stop.
> I'll send an email to this list announcing before I start (so get
> anything checked into SVN now while you can). And I'll send email
> out afterwards saying that it is done. (And that the Jenkins
> owners should reconfigure their jenkins) and then to TEI-L noting
> the change of URLs for the repository etc.
>
> -James
>
>
> On 12/03/13 17:33, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>
>> On 12 Mar 2013, at 16:30, James Cummings <james.cummings at it.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> One of the decisions is whether this is a good point to move
>>> community-contributed code out of the repository (e.g. things
>>> like Byzantium and Vesta and process-pb).  I'd be interested in a
>>> list from people, especially Sebastian, of what they think should
>>> be moved elsewhere?
>>
>>
>> I'm happy to move passivetex, Stylesheets-xslt1, TEIOO-Deprecated, TEIWORD, jerusalem, Vesta and tei-emacs to Github;
>> but I see any advantage to doing it before the migration. Just press the button, Luke.
>>
>> Byzantium is not on SF
>>
>> process-pb is part of Stylesjheets. splitting that is a bigger project
>> --
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Director (Research) of Academic IT
>> University of Oxford IT Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>
>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Digital Humanities
King's College London
Boris Karloff Building
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/