[tei-council] Release date?

[James Cummings]

I agree with Sebastian that we should do it (because the early 
explanation is misleading). I agree with Lou that it should be 
where it is currently proposed. (And once there, I think it is 
less problematic to move, split, or re-organise it in a 
subsequent review... but yes, of course, nice to get it right 
first time.)
Also, I should point out that the freeze of last night is 
intended for *schema-affecting* changes. Changing of prose, 
correcting typos, etc. are allowed (if important) up until Hugh 
announces a release freeze as part of the steps of making a 
release tomorrow.

-James


On 16/01/13 20:44, Lou Burnard wrote:
> On 16/01/13 20:17, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16 Jan 2013, at 19:02, "Kevin Hawkins" <kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info> wrote:
>>
>>> I think it works as its own section but perhaps is in the wrong place in
>>> the Guidelines.  What if it were inserted as a new section 3.3, between
>>> the current 3.2 and 3.3?
>>>
>> Better. Needs some change to wording in section on "other global attributes" too maybe?
>>
>
> Sorry, I disagree, though I do think we need a reference to (and
> possibly some dioscuassion of) the issue in the current 3.2, on punctuation.
>
> Its current proposed location makes sense : it's in a section where we
> discuss the global attributes, one of which is xml:space.  I would
> suggest splitting "Other global attributes" into two distinct sections,
> one on xml:base, one on xml:space and losing, or duplicating the current
> initial sentence about xml: namespaced attributes.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Academic IT Services, University of Oxford