[tei-council] att.sourced (<lb ed="1674">) contradiction

[Gabriel Bodard]

@resp is slightly different, isn't it? It's saying who made the encoding 
decision to put an <lb/> tag here in the document. @ed is saying, this 
is the edition in which (the current encoder asserts) a line begins here.

On 05/01/2013 23:24, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> On 5 Jan 2013, at 23:20, Gabriel Bodard <gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk>
>   wrote:
>
>>
>> Adding @edRef seems nicer to me though. It has the advantage of keeping
>> @ed "dumb" while adding smartness, and parallels @lemma[Ref] nicely.
>
>
> we shouldnt be using the existing @resp?
> --
> Sebastian Rahtz
> http://www.justgiving.com/SebastianRahtz
> Director (Research Support) of Academic IT Services
> University of Oxford IT Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/