[tei-council] att.sourced (<lb ed="1674">) contradiction

[Gabriel Bodard]

On 05/01/2013 23:16, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> indeed. how do you answer António Rito Silva, though? by adding edRef?

One possibility. Or treating it like a key--a magic bullet. 
Project-specific definition for how it relates to a bibliographical 
entry in the header or elsewhere in the project documentation.

Adding @edRef seems nicer to me though. It has the advantage of keeping 
@ed "dumb" while adding smartness, and parallels @lemma[Ref] nicely.

G

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/