[tei-council] Unfinished <quotation> element in example?

[Kevin Hawkins]

I support allowing members of model.encodingDescPart with have 
specialized attributes to be empty elements -- that is, changing 
model.pLike+ to model.pLike*.  We might get questions from people about 
why certain members of model.encodingDescPart require at least one <p> 
inside while others don't, but I think our rationale for doing so is 
pretty sound.

Should this be a ticket for discussion with a wider community, or should 
we just do this?

On 11/23/12 6:07 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> I think changing the content model to permit an empty element would be
> preferable.
> Same probably applies to those other members of enodingDesc which have
> specialised attributes like this.
>
>
> On 22/11/12 22:43, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Jinks seems to be showing a new error it hasn't shown before, triggered
>> by validation of an example in the CO chapter, in COHQ:
>>
>> 'warning: unfinished element "quotation": "((teix:p | teix:ab))+"
>> required to finish the element'
>>
>> This is the relevant bit of the example:
>>
>> <quotation marks="none"/>
>>
>> According to the content model, this is an error:
>>
>>      <content>
>>        <oneOrMore xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0">
>>          <ref name="model.pLike"/>
>>        </oneOrMore>
>>      </content>
>>
>> But the content model hasn't changed since April, and the CO chapter
>> hasn't changed for three weeks. Does anyone remember seeing the error
>> before? We don't seem to have discussed the issue of the content model
>> of <quotation> on the Council list or on SF recently.
>>
>> Should we change the content model of <quotation> to <zeroOrMore>? Or
>> would it be better to supply a paragraph with some explanation in the
>> example?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>>
>