[tei-council] datcat's ugly head

[Piotr Banski]

That's my bit of enlightenment of yesterday. I was utterly unhappy 
thinking that I was supposed to put in something completely incomplete...

Then I reread the minutes and realised that I was (I now /hope/ I was) 
misinterpreting, and that all that the Council did in Oxford was in fact 
give a green light to starting work on this concept. Right?

   P.

On 25/10/12 12:41, James Cummings wrote:
> On 25/10/12 11:31, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> On 25 Oct 2012, at 11:23, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>
>>    wrote:
>>
>>> Let's come back to this after the release: it's tricky.
>>
>> yes. its not at all obvious which way to jump.
>>
>> Similarly, I am
>> nervous about just adding <standoff> at the last minute without
>> any supporting prose drafted. This will be a big deal, and needs
>> a full-scale consultation, examples, and so on
>
> I didn't think we _had_ added <standoff> had we? I agree with all
> that you said, big change. We've agreed it is a good idea but
> that means more work on prose, drafting examples, etc.
>
> I certainly don't see a standoff.xml in P5/Source/Specs ?
>
> -James
>
>> --
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Director (Research Support) of Academic IT Services
>> University of Oxford IT Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>
>
>