[tei-council] documenting xml:space
James Cummings
James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Wed Oct 24 07:44:27 EDT 2012
On 24/10/12 03:36, Rebecca Welzenbach wrote:
> Here I think he means <encodingDesc>. This warrants discussion and perhaps
> its own ticket: do we want to expand <normalization> to include how the
> encoder expects a processor to handle whitespace? In addition, although it
> is not mentioned in the ticket, in his wiki page, John suggests that even
> in cases where no modification to whitespace normalization is expected,
> encoders should state this explicitly, rather than letting it be implied by
> omission. Do we agree?
That seems reasonable to me.
> I propose:
> - Close this ticket. The things that John is asking for have been, or
> are being, addressed elsewhere. John asks for these recommendations to be
> added to the attribute spec, but I propose that we stick with handling them
> in the prose.
> - Pending council feedback, open a new ticket to address the question of
> documenting assumptions about whitespace normalization in the header
> - Open a new ticket to revise/edit for clarity the prose dealing with
> whitespace at 1.3.1.1.4. The prose as it stands is not wrong: it is
> consistent with what John asks for in this ticket, and covers the same
> ground, but it could be clearer and easier to read.
I'd agree with that.
-James
--
Dr James Cummings, researchsupport at it.ox.ac.uk
Research Support, IT Services, University of Oxford
More information about the tei-council
mailing list