[tei-council] Fwd: Re: Lite and/or _Lite?

[Kevin Hawkins]

So, even with a note in the minutes for posterity, we still have both 
"teilite.xml" and "tei_lite.odd" in the repository.  Can we get rid of 
the one that uses exclusion and keep only the one that uses inclusion? 
Right now it's very easy for someone to accidentally consult or even 
edit the wrong file.  --Kevin

On 8/3/12 12:28 AM, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> For the record, I've added the note to the minutes.
>
> On 7/25/12 8:17 PM, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>> Just like you, I am trying to clarify things.  I bring it up hoping that
>> someone will say, "Ah, I made that change shortly after Ann Arbor" or
>> something like that.  Then I can perhaps add a note in the minutes so
>> that future historians of the TEI can make sense of them.
>>
>> On 7/25/12 6:03 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [tei-council] Lite and/or _Lite?
>>> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:03:40 +0100
>>> From: Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>
>>> To: Kevin Hawkins <kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info>
>>>
>>> The minutes from Ann Arbor could be mistaken, or someone may have been
>>> mistaken in asserting that we were actually still using teilite rather
>>> than tei_lite . Does it matter? The current state of affairs is what we
>>> all agreed we wanted!
>>>
>>> I dont know when we started generating from tei_lite, but I think
>>> Sebastian is right in suggesting it was well before the AA meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25/07/12 22:58, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>>>> So are you saying that someone has changed what we are generating in
>>>> Jenkins since Ann Arbor?  That is, what was stated in Ann Arbor is no
>>>> longer true?
>>>>
>>>> On 7/25/2012 5:32 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>>>> Yes, as my second mail points out, we are indeed currently generating
>>>>> from the "inclusion" version. Which is what the minutes say we agreed
>>>>> (inter alia) to do.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25/07/12 22:26, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>>>>>> Hmm, according to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/Council/Meetings/tcm50.xml#body.1_div.1_div.2_div.2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we are using the exclusion version (teilite.odd) to generate schemas.
>>>>>> That could be an error in the minutes, or someone may have misspoken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/25/2012 5:13 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>>>>>> I should also add that the Makefile in Exemplars (and presumably
>>>>>>> therefore also Mr Jinks) only builds the tei_lite version. As it
>>>>>>> should.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 25/07/12 22:10, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm finally getting round to the action placed on me at last
>>>>>>>> Council
>>>>>>>> meeting concerning the ever popular "TEI Lite" document, and would
>>>>>>>> appreciate confirmation that I'm about to do the right thing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are still two versions of this ODD in the svn repository
>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>> Exemplars: one (called tei_lite.odd) is defined by inclusion; the
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> (called teilite.odd) is defined by exclusion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure we agreed that we would henceforth maintain this
>>>>>>>> document only in the "inclusion" form, if only so that we don't
>>>>>>>> have to
>>>>>>>> keep fixing it every time some new element is added to the
>>>>>>>> Guidelines
>>>>>>>> (which happens surprisingly often). But I'd like confirmation on
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> before zapping teilite.odd or moving it to the
>>>>>>>> "Deprecated-old-junk"
>>>>>>>> folder. Another possibility would of course be to maintain the
>>>>>>>> two of
>>>>>>>> them (possibly with some slightly less obscure naming difference)
>>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>> am hoping we don't want to do that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Needless to say, the two versions have diverged slightly, with some
>>>>>>>> recent minor updates being made independently by different
>>>>>>>> people to
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> two files, or to only one of them: I will in any case sort that
>>>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>