[tei-council] Fwd: Re: Lite and/or _Lite?

[Lou Burnard]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [tei-council] Lite and/or _Lite?
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:03:40 +0100
From: Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>
To: Kevin Hawkins <kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info>

The minutes from Ann Arbor could be mistaken, or someone may have been
mistaken in asserting that we were actually still using teilite rather
than tei_lite . Does it matter? The current state of affairs is what we
all agreed we wanted!

I dont know when we started generating from tei_lite, but I think
Sebastian is right in suggesting it was well before the AA meeting.


On 25/07/12 22:58, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> So are you saying that someone has changed what we are generating in
> Jenkins since Ann Arbor?  That is, what was stated in Ann Arbor is no
> longer true?
>
> On 7/25/2012 5:32 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> Yes, as my second mail points out, we are indeed currently generating
>> from the "inclusion" version. Which is what the minutes say we agreed
>> (inter alia) to do.
>>
>>
>> On 25/07/12 22:26, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>>> Hmm, according to:
>>>
>>> http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/Council/Meetings/tcm50.xml#body.1_div.1_div.2_div.2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> we are using the exclusion version (teilite.odd) to generate schemas.
>>> That could be an error in the minutes, or someone may have misspoken.
>>>
>>> On 7/25/2012 5:13 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>>> I should also add that the Makefile in Exemplars (and presumably
>>>> therefore also Mr Jinks) only builds the tei_lite version. As it
>>>> should.
>>>>
>>>> On 25/07/12 22:10, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>>>> I'm finally getting round to the action placed on me at last Council
>>>>> meeting concerning the ever popular "TEI Lite" document, and would
>>>>> appreciate confirmation that I'm about to do the right thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are still two versions of this ODD in the svn repository under
>>>>> Exemplars: one (called tei_lite.odd) is defined by inclusion; the
>>>>> other
>>>>> (called teilite.odd) is defined by exclusion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm pretty sure we agreed that we would henceforth maintain this
>>>>> document only in the "inclusion" form, if only so that we don't
>>>>> have to
>>>>> keep fixing it every time some new element is added to the Guidelines
>>>>> (which happens surprisingly often). But I'd like confirmation on that
>>>>> before zapping teilite.odd or moving it to the "Deprecated-old-junk"
>>>>> folder. Another possibility would of course be to maintain the two of
>>>>> them (possibly with some slightly less obscure naming difference)
>>>>> but I
>>>>> am hoping we don't want to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Needless to say, the two versions have diverged slightly, with some
>>>>> recent minor updates being made independently by different people to
>>>>> the
>>>>> two files, or to only one of them: I will in any case sort that out.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>