[tei-council] Private URI Schemes

[Martin Holmes]

Lou responded to me directly on this -- hope it's OK to quote his 
comments to the list.

He's absolutely right that the attribute names should be harmonized with 
<cRefPattern>; I've now done that, and expanded the proposal a bit so it 
places the attributes in a proposed new attribute class:

<http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Private_URI_Schemes>

Cheers,
Martin

On 12-07-05 05:03 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> On 27/06/12 18:22, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've had a couple of discussions about the magic token vs. private URI
>> scheme issue over the past couple of meetings, and now I've put together
>> a brief description of the way I had imagined putting the use of private
>> URI schemes on a more solid footing than magic tokens:
>>
>> <http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Private_URI_Schemes>
>>
>> Could you take a look and let me know what you think?
>>
>
> At first glance, this looks really useful.
>
> It is almost the same mechanism as that we currently use for
> <cRefPattern>, except that the latter has slightly divergent attribute
> names. Can we harmonise the two? Can we find other cases where this sort
> of meta-mechanism should be fitted?
>
>

-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)