[tei-council] next release?

[James Cummings]

A reminder to all that we're now coming up to our 15 June release 
date.

Get any changes in, soon, and mark them off:
http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/AnnArbor2012-Actions

-James

On 20/05/12 21:47, James Cummings wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think events have caught up with us and that May 25th deadline
> is looming.  I know I've barely chipped the surface of things
> assigned to me, and the meeting minutes are still coming (almost
> there I'm told).  I propose that we push back the next release
> until the week ending 15 June.  Does that seem unreasonable for
> anyone, or any counter proposals?
>
> -James
>
> On 25/04/12 22:02, Gabriel BODARD wrote:
>> The first week of June is likely to be bad for me; I'm back from
>> international travel around the 4th, I think, and will be groggy the
>> first couple days after that. So if not May 25th, then best to put it
>> off by two weeks. (Or someone else be launch technician...)
>>
>> G
>>
>> On 24/04/2012 10:42, James Cummings wrote:
>>>
>>> What do others think? We can of course move releasing back to
>>> whenever we've finished a majority of tickets, but I'd prefer
>>> sooner rather than later and a deadline that forces us to get
>>> stuff done.
>>>
>>> I'm of the opinion that we probably don't need to telco before
>>> this release (we can, after all, conduct business on the mailing
>>> list), but would do so shortly after the release to get updates
>>> on the longer-term issues and reports from the council working
>>> groups.
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> -James
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/04/12 22:20, Piotr Bański wrote:
>>>> Hi James,
>>>>
>>>> Isn't May 25 roughly in the middle of LREC? Could we shift by a week
>>>> from then, please?
>>>>
>>>> (I actually intend to be ready with my stuff [and possibly more] in
>>>> advance this time, but I've made some such totally honest promises to
>>>> myself and to the world recently, several times, and with meager results...)
>>>>
>>>> Ah. Will we telco before releasing?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>       P.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23/04/12 17:47, James Cummings wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How about we set a notional target release date of 25 May?  (This
>>>>> is about 5 weeks from now.) If we assume that we want most things
>>>>> completed by the end of Sunday 20th, to allow time for
>>>>> proofreading and error spotting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that sounds reasonable to most people?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gaby: Most importantly, does the proposed Release Technician like
>>>>> these dates?
>>>>>
>>>>> -James
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/04/12 18:50, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> Three weeks will be a bit tough for me, and a couple of the tickets I
>>>>>> have might turn out to have unpredicted side-effects (like the tei_
>>>>>> prefix). As long as we have the option to launch without the change if
>>>>>> it proves difficult, we could go with three weeks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The attributes-without-examples problem is so large that we'll just have
>>>>>> to hack away at it steadily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12-04-21 04:03 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>>>>>> something we forgot to debate in Ann Arbor was a timetable
>>>>>>> for the next release, I think? i.e. what is the due date for
>>>>>>> everyone to complete their ticket work so that Sir Gabriel
>>>>>>> of B'odard can undertake his Quest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> speaking for myself, if I don't do my assignments
>>>>>>> more or less immediately I will not get to them for ages,
>>>>>>> so I favour a short window (say, 3 weeks).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Dr James Cummings, InfoDev,
Computing Services, University of Oxford