[tei-council] error in Spec for node?

[Lou Burnard]

I think it's useful. The point is that in the TEI representation of a 
network, you can specify the arcs either explicitly, using <arc>, or 
implicitly using the attributes on <node> . In either case, there is a 
need to explain how arcs may be labelled, and to specify what it means 
if there is more than one of them.

Maybe the version of these remarks on <node> would be improved by 
changing "arc" to "implied arc" (or some such phrase)

On 11/06/12 10:52, stuart yeates wrote:
> The spec for node has a remark at the bottom which makes no sense to me
> as a remark on node. It does, however, make perfect sense as a remark
> for arc and there is a similar remark on the arc spec.
>
> Unless someone has a sane explanation of it's existence, I'm proposing
> to delete the remark from node.
>
> cheers
> stuart