[tei-council] content model of <surface>

[Lou Burnard]

On 09/05/12 11:11, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> On 9 May 2012, at 10:33, Lou Burnard wrote:
>
>> The reqsons it is this way is because the wg expressed the (admittedly rather vague) desire that old skool<surface>  (for digital facsimile) and new skool (for genetic flummery) should have only limited co-existence.
>>
> I think, then, that my solution fits their criteria. It fails to validate real examples, unfortunately.
>
>

Even with your recent adjustment, the model is arguably too complex. 
Remember that at some point in the future when we've forgotten why we 
did this, someone will have to explain it.
n