[tei-council] version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"

[Gabriel Bodard]

In that case, could I slip geo -> att.declaring into this one? Or would 
that be rude for a sub-decimal release?

G

On 2012-01-12 17:39, Martin Holmes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think we need to release a 2.0.2 soon, during which we again run
> through the instructions, after adding the tagging instruction. Should
> we do a quick trawl through the tickets and decide which ones might be
> polished off quickly without controversy?
>
> Can I be the one to go through the release steps this time?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> On 12-01-12 08:27 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:
>> Dear geeks again,
>>
>> again wondering: just downloaded the current release 2.0.1 from sourceforge (tei-2.0.1.zip) and the editionStmt at tei-2.0.1/xml/tei/p5subset.xml reads<edition>2.0.0 Last updated on<date when="2011-12-16">16th December 2011</date>.</edition>
>>
>> Does that mean it wasn't updated at all or is just the editionStmt wrong?
>>
>> Many thanks again
>> Peter
>>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/