[tei-council] CDATA islands in <egXML>

[Martin Holmes]

I'm going to stay away from stuff in TD for the moment, because the 
potential for use-mention errors is huge, what with documenting the 
documentation of documents and tags for the tagging of tags and suchlike.

I think I'm going to file a longer-term ticket to suggest a careful 
trawl through all our <egXML> and <eg> tags. Many of them look to be 
survivals from a previous state when @valid didn't exist, but messing 
with them at this late stage, except when they're obviously 
straightforward, might not be wise. It's the kind of thing where you 
don't quite know what's going to happen until you try it, and let 
Jenkins have at it.

I've just filed a couple of other tickets intended for after "2.0.0 
Laurentian" is released, and I think this would make another good one.

Cheers,
Martin

On 11-12-08 03:11 PM, James Cummings wrote:
>
> There are some eg's containing egXML wrapped in CDATA in TD I believe. What about those?
> Should those be egXML wrapped egXML?
>
> Jamesc
> --
> James Cummings, InfoDev, OUCS, University of Oxford (via phone)
>
> Sebastian Rahtz<sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>
> valid="false" should be fine. So long as its well-formed XML. we have an example of this in TS already.
> --
> Stormageddon Rahtz
> Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>
> --
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)