[tei-council] Fwd: Xpointer (was Re: Budget and Cost Saving for next year)

[Laurent Romary]

Hi Gabriel,
Are you OK to take the lead for the group (Hugh, Piotr, Martin and myself in a corner).
Your mission: design a clear strategic plan for the TEI in relation to xpointers (whatever that means - you'll have to explain)
Thanks,
Laurent


Début du message réexpédié :

> De : Hugh Cayless <philomousos at gmail.com>
> Date : 29 novembre 2011 17:49:34 HNEC
> À : Laurent Romary <laurent.romary at inria.fr>
> Objet : Rép : [tei-council] Xpointer (was Re: Budget and Cost Saving for next year)
> 
> Hi Laurent. Yeah, sure. Gabby and I were just talking about this yesterday.
> 
> Hugh
> 
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:29AM, Laurent Romary wrote:
> 
>> Hi Hugh,
>> Do you want ot be in there?
>> Cheers,
>> Laurent
>> 
>> Début du message réexpédié :
>> 
>>> De : Piotr Bański <bansp at o2.pl>
>>> Date : 29 novembre 2011 17:04:31 HNEC
>>> À : tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> Objet : Rép : [tei-council] Xpointer (was Re: Budget and Cost Saving for next year)
>>> 
>>> Seconded! :-)
>>> 
>>> On 29/11/11 16:53, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>>> I'm happy to be involved. I nominate Gabby for lead.:-)
>>>> 
>>>> On 11-11-28 10:31 PM, Laurent Romary wrote:
>>>>> The idea of a small working group on this is an excellent one. Could someone stand up to take the lead on this?
>>>>> Laurent
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le 28 nov. 2011 à 18:41, Gabriel Bodard a écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can I ask, did Xpointer get any discussion in Paris? I don't see any
>>>>>> reference to it in the minutes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There wasn't much of a conclusion to the email thread, as far as I can
>>>>>> see. Looks a bit like we were simultaneously coming to the conclusions
>>>>>> that (a) we should drop TEI Xpointer, and (b) it might not be that
>>>>>> hard/expensive to implement after all.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Assuming there hasn't been more discussion and decision-making that I've
>>>>>> missed, should we set up a small working group (containing at least
>>>>>> Piotr, Martin, Hugh Cayless, and whoever else we think might be
>>>>>> interested and/or competent) to discuss and make some concrete proposals
>>>>>> for how to go forward. I certainly see people who care about the aims of
>>>>>> the xpointer scheme, whether or not they think this is the correct
>>>>>> implementation of it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> G
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2011-11-02 18:18, Piotr Bański wrote:
>>>>>>> Ah,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I've had a closer look at the SF ticket too:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "The following schemes are supported by this implementation:
>>>>>>> - XPointer element() Scheme
>>>>>>> - XPointer xmlns() Scheme
>>>>>>> - XPointer xmlns-local() Sc
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dr Gabriel BODARD
>>>>>> (Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Department of Digital Humanities
>>>>>> King's College London
>>>>>> 26-29 Drury Lane
>>>>>> London WC2B 5RL
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
>>>>>> Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
>>>>>> Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
>>>>>> http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> tei-council mailing list
>>>>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>>>> 
>>>>> Laurent Romary
>>>>> INRIA&  HUB-IDSL
>>>>> laurent.romary at inria.fr
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> tei-council mailing list
>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>> 
>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>> 
>> Laurent Romary
>> INRIA & HUB-IDSL
>> laurent.romary at inria.fr
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr