[tei-council] Disambiguation of <ident> and <idno> (and also <gi>)
Laurent Romary
laurent.romary at inria.fr
Wed Nov 23 02:29:27 EST 2011
Hi Martin,
This is a very accurate proposal. I am OK with everything, except that I would consider the brown case as neither an ident nor an idno but a real ref here.
Otherwise, unless we hear some shouts, I would encourage you to implement.
Cheers,
Laurent
Le 23 nov. 2011 à 01:16, Martin Holmes a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Following the Council meeting in Paris I was tasked with
> <http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3188679>:
>
> "...Assigned to MH to clarify the guidelines on the difference between
> <idno> and <ident>..."
>
> This is how they're currently defined:
>
> "<ident> (identifier) contains an identifier or name for an object of
> some kind in a formal language."
>
> "<idno> (identifier) supplies any form of identifier used to identify
> some object, such as a bibliographic item, a person, a title, an
> organization, etc. in a standardized way."
>
>
> My initial impulse is to supplement these descriptions with something
> along these lines:
>
> -------
> <ident> should be used for tokens such as variable names, class names,
> type names, function names etc. in formal programming languages. (It
> should not be used for element and attribute names in XML, for which the
> special elements <gi> and <att> are provided.)
>
> <idno> should be used for labels which uniquely identify an object or
> concept in a formal cataloguing system such as a database or an RDF
> store, or in a distributed system such as the World Wide Web.
> --------------
>
> In the Guidelines themselves, we use <ident> (correctly in my view) for
> the names of classes such as att.internetMedia, and the names of modules
> such as "core" and "header". But we also use it for values such as the
> following:
>
> http://www.example.com/browncorpus
> p299
>
> I think these are actually wrong and should be corrected -- see below.
>
>
> <idno>, on the other hand, is used for lots of URLs (clearly
> legitimate), as well as DOIs and semi-descriptive pointers which are
> presumably resolvably unique -- here's a sample:
>
> 119
> L434
> 0-19-254705-4
> 1256
> 0143-3385
> doi:10.1000/123
> http://authority.nzetc.org/463/
> Thomason Tract E.537(17)
> C695
> 1-896016-00-6
> 0 345 6789
> 1140-3853
> NISTIR 4681
> 978 0 573 01972 2
> MS. Add. A. 61
> 28843
> MS Poet. Rawl. D. 169.
> RES P- YC- 1275
> Y. 1341
> Taisho Tripitaka Vol. T08, No. 230
>
>
> So I have two questions for the group:
>
> 1. Do you think that my explanatory text is accurate and helpful enough
> to do the job of disambiguating these two elements?
>
> 2. Does our usage of the tags in the Guidelines comply with what we
> believe to be the use-cases of the elements? (Ignoring for the moment
> the case of the questionable uses of <ident> below.)
>
>
>
> * I think <ident> is questionable here, and based on the definitions
> above, I think <idno> should be used instead:
>
> <p>[...]
> <egXML xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/Examples"
> xml:lang="und"><catRef target="#b.a4 #b.d2"
> scheme="http://www.example.com/browncorpus"/><catRef
> target="http://www.example.com/SUC/#A45"/></egXML>
> Here the same text has been classified as of categories <val>b.a4</val> and
> <val>b.d2</val> within the Brown classification scheme (presumed to be
> available from <ident
> type="file">http://www.example.com/browncorpus</ident>), and as of category
> <q>A45</q> within the SUC classification scheme documented at the URL
> given.</p>
>
> If I'm right, then many other uses of <ident type="file"> might also be
> <idno>, assuming that a filesystem is a "formal cataloguing system",
> which it surely is.
>
>
> ** I think <ident> is wrong here; it should be <val>:
>
> <p>[...]
> Here the targets of the cross-references are simply page numbers; it
> is assumed that corresponding elements with identifiers
> <ident>p299</ident>, <ident>p143</ident>, etc. have been provided in
> the body of the text, for example as page breaks
> <egXML xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/Examples" xml:lang="und">
> <pb xml:id="p143"/>
> ...
> <pb xml:id="p144"/>
> ...
> <pb xml:id="p263"/>
> ...
> <pb xml:id="p299"/>
> ...
> <pb xml:id="p442"/>
> ...
> </egXML></p>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> --
> Martin Holmes
> University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
> (mholmes at uvic.ca)
> --
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr
More information about the tei-council
mailing list