[tei-council] surfaces, surfaceGrps, etc. [was : minutes/release deadline]

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 19 Nov 2011, at 18:25, Lou Burnard wrote:

> Sorry to come back to this after such a long pause. Let's see if I've 
> got it right yet:
> 
> We distinguish two use cases:
> 
> a. a surface within a surface, both using the same coord system
> 
> b. a surface within a surface, which sets up a new coord system
> 
yes, I think so. It's a bit tricky - coords are mandatory on outer surface, but
optional on inner. expressible in Schematron easily enough

your examples look right to me.

> Did we agree by the way, that <surfaceGrp> can take coordinates, and 
> behave in the same way as <surface> ?

I wont comment on that cos I dont understand surfaceGrp yet...
> 
> And did we agree on how to interpret the case where a <surface> contains 
> both coordinates and @points?

its a plain ole error, I'd say. 

--
Stormageddon Rahtz      
Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente