[tei-council] confusion about TEI at version and teiCorpus at version
kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info
Sun Nov 13 16:38:50 EST 2011
Shouldn't the datatype TEI at version and teiCorpus at version (but not
unicodeName at version) be xsd:anyURI so that these two work like @source
(in att.readFrom)? If so, should I submit this as as bug report or a
But more generally, what purpose do TEI at version and teiCorpus at version
serve? We say that people should use a customization of the TEI, so in
what way would a given TEI document be valid against a "version number
of the TEI Guidelines" (as defined for TEI at version) or "the TEI scheme"
(as defined for teiCorpus at version)?
More information about the tei-council