[tei-council] Notes on chapter 11 (part one)

[Martin Holmes]

NO, it's the use of "rectangular" on <zone> that I'm objecting to, not 
on <surface>.

On 11-11-08 09:20 AM, James Cummings wrote:
> On 08/11/11 07:10, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> "...<surface>   defines a written surface in terms of a rectangular
>> coordinate space, optionally grouping one or more graphic
>> representations of that space, and rectangular zones of interest within
>> it." ["rectangular" is obsolete.]
>
> Surface is noted as being rectangular everywhere it is mention, e.g. its
> reference page. So if surfaces are allowed to be non-rectangular then it
> needs to be changed many places.
>
> -James
>