[tei-council] TEI Licensing

[Piotr Bański]

On 29/09/11 16:54, Martin Holmes wrote:
> On 11-09-28 09:20 PM, John Unsworth wrote:
[...]
>> That doesn't mean that LGPL applies in other situations, but I did
>> want to let the Council and Board know that this particular case has
>> been moved forward.  And for what it's worth, I think there should be
>> one licensing scheme for all the TEI IP.
> 
> I agree. I think the boundaries between documentation and software are 
> impossible to draw in the case of the TEI ecosystem.

Inability to draw a non-fuzzy border does not justify pretending that
the border isn't there... Part of the ecosystem is clearly software.
Part of it is clearly documentation. And there is a sizeable grey area,
and its greyness comes largely from the lack of legal precedents. But
let's not pretend that everything is grey, it isn't.

  P.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4054 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20110929/a758ac0f/attachment.bin