[tei-council] @key to be deprecated?
Laurent Romary
laurent.romary at inria.fr
Fri Sep 16 12:22:10 EDT 2011
The question is, what does this bring us which would be better than @key? Just the fact that we assert our own unicity? I understand there is no register, etc. for such things. And why not use classical URI?
Good thread, makes me think...
Le 16 sept. 2011 à 15:42, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :
>
> On 16 Sep 2011, at 13:52, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't it be local:// then?
>
> I dont think so
>>
>> Do you happen to remember where this was discussed?
>
>
> Kevin just pointed to http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2919640&group_id=106328&atid=644065
> which has me saying
>
> "a) actually use URNs in their full raging glory, as in
> <p facs="urn:www.ox.ac.uk:P45">Hello world</p>
>
> b) invent an arbitrary schema, which means something to you:
>
> <p facs="oxpics:P45">Hello world</p>
>
> c) use "tag URIs" as documented in RFC 4151
> (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4151.txt)"
>
> <p facs="tag:indiana.edu:P45:>Hello world</p>
> "
> --
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Head of Information and Support Group
> Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr
More information about the tei-council
mailing list