[tei-council] P5 1.10?

[Laurent Romary]

Unless we are very pragmatic and we consider that the revision mechanisms we have can make the thing evolve by itself when published. I don't think that we can reach a community consensus on all features, most of which have not yet been extensively tested within actual projects.

My question to the experts is: do we have a good core that could theoretically be publishable as is?

If yes, we can make a round of review to the community (with a request that they use SF extensively, otherwise, I don't see how to sort things out). Then we finalize this in November for "immediate" publication. 

I also have the feeling that bringing the naming issue to the community may introduce more noise than anything else and that we need to stabilize something.

Le 13 sept. 2011 à 22:42, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :

> On 13 Sep 2011, at 21:37, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> 
>> Not so.  There are, believe it or not, some experts in this particular 
>> domain who did not have a hand in either draft. I have met some -- 
>> indeed was talking to two of them only last week. (They expressed, fwiw, 
>> astonishment that the current draft doesn't say anything about how you 
>> represent the size of the writing in a particular zone)
> 
> ah well, if thats so, then we're in a for a long haul.

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr