[tei-council] Fwd: TEI licensing issues

Piotr Bański bansp at o2.pl
Fri Sep 9 07:03:13 EDT 2011

On 09/09/11 12:48, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> shall we just remove the license entirely? ie use the wording of CC0 in the generated files?

That would mean public domain, which might be fine for the TEI-C in this
very context, though I'd say that at least the BY aspect is usually
worth keeping.

Do excuse a potentially silly question: would the CC0 (or whatever) be
automatically generated by Roma for *any* input ODD, or would it be
dependent on a setting within the ODD, and the TEI-C ODDs would just
set the value of the generated-schema-license to X?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4054 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20110909/869436bc/attachment.bin 

More information about the tei-council mailing list