[tei-council] Genetic Proposals

[Lou Burnard]

On 05/09/11 20:46, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> On 5 Sep 2011, at 18:49, Lou Burnard wrote:
>
>> Several major issues still remain unresolved though. Inter alia:
>>
>> 1. What's the name of the elephant? (I am currently liking<source>)
>>
>> 2. What shall we call<layers>,<layer>   and  @layer?
>>
>> 3. Do we need both<block>  and<zone>?
>
> hasn't the time come to pass these by the broader community?

I proposed that a week or two back, but the consensus was agin it.

>
> tho if I was a voting man, I'd say

surely you *are* a voting man?

>
>   <sourceDoc>

too close to <sourceDesc> for my liking

>   <changeSet>

a bit long winded -- for all three?

>   no. use<block>  passim

so you'd say <surface> contains <block>s rather than <zone>s? And where 
do you stand on the multipurpose <zone> (containing either graphics, or 
transcription, or both)



> --
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>