[tei-council] Genetic Proposals
lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk
Mon Sep 5 16:13:55 EDT 2011
On 05/09/11 20:46, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 5 Sep 2011, at 18:49, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> Several major issues still remain unresolved though. Inter alia:
>> 1. What's the name of the elephant? (I am currently liking<source>)
>> 2. What shall we call<layers>,<layer> and @layer?
>> 3. Do we need both<block> and<zone>?
> hasn't the time come to pass these by the broader community?
I proposed that a week or two back, but the consensus was agin it.
> tho if I was a voting man, I'd say
surely you *are* a voting man?
too close to <sourceDesc> for my liking
a bit long winded -- for all three?
> no. use<block> passim
so you'd say <surface> contains <block>s rather than <zone>s? And where
do you stand on the multipurpose <zone> (containing either graphics, or
transcription, or both)
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
More information about the tei-council