[tei-council] genetic draft -- from Brett, pt. 2

[Lou Burnard]

Nothing in the draft is set in stone. (though I did think we had decided 
on "layer") No need to rehearse arguments against it yet -- keep your 
powder dry!

L

p.s. how about "

On 25/08/11 15:10, Brett Barney wrote:
>
> I would love to see something like what Sebastian suggests, and if the
> carving of<layer>  in stone isn't imminent I'd like to spend my time right
> now on other parts of the draft rather than on marshalling a case against
> <layer>. Is that safe to do?
>
> Brett
>
> ------------------
> Brett Barney
> Research Associate Professor
> Center for Digital Research in the Humanities, University of
> Nebraska-Lincoln
> http://cdrh.unl.edu
>
> Sebastian Rahtz<sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk>  wrote on 08/24/2011
> 03:51:40 PM:
>
>> <changeSet>/<layer>   and<document>/<transcription>/</sourceDoc>
>> might well benefit
>> from a general poll on TEI-L before final release.
>>
>> Agreeing with Brett, so far as<layer>  goes, I'd give the final say
>> to the genetic WG which punted for<changeSet>.
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing
> Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>
>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived