[tei-council] genetic draft -- from Brett, pt. 2
lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk
Thu Aug 25 10:41:09 EDT 2011
Nothing in the draft is set in stone. (though I did think we had decided
on "layer") No need to rehearse arguments against it yet -- keep your
p.s. how about "
On 25/08/11 15:10, Brett Barney wrote:
> I would love to see something like what Sebastian suggests, and if the
> carving of<layer> in stone isn't imminent I'd like to spend my time right
> now on other parts of the draft rather than on marshalling a case against
> <layer>. Is that safe to do?
> Brett Barney
> Research Associate Professor
> Center for Digital Research in the Humanities, University of
> Sebastian Rahtz<sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote on 08/24/2011
> 03:51:40 PM:
>> <changeSet>/<layer> and<document>/<transcription>/</sourceDoc>
>> might well benefit
>> from a general poll on TEI-L before final release.
>> Agreeing with Brett, so far as<layer> goes, I'd give the final say
>> to the genetic WG which punted for<changeSet>.
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
More information about the tei-council