[tei-council] <licence>

[Martin Holmes]

On 11-08-22 07:54 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> On 22/08/11 15:46, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> the downside for 3. is that it allows
>>
>>     <p></p>
>>     <license>
>>           <p>
>>           </p>
>>     <licence>
>>     <p></p>
>>
>> in an interleavy sort of way, but what the heck, its no worse than many another thing.
>>
>> would it be ok for leave this until the end of the week, and I implement it then if
>> no-one has raised further objections?
>
> At present, the P5 build fails because licence is inaccessible, so
> according to the (unwritten) rule book, someone should either do the
> implementation a bit sooner than the end of the week, or revert the
> addition of licence. Martin was looking at this earlier so maybe he'd
> like to comment? Implementation is just a matter of adding the new
> class, and adding licence to it.

I broke the P5 build by adding the <exemplum> elements with examples of 
<licence>, so it could be temporarily unbroken by commenting those out 
until we've made our minds up. I'm happy to do that if necessary, but 
personally I think we have more chance of getting the whole ticket 
resolved if we keep working on it. My vote is for Sebastian to do what 
he says above.

Cheers,
Martin


-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)