[tei-council] <licence>

[Lou Burnard]

On 22/08/11 15:46, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> the downside for 3. is that it allows
>
>    <p></p>
>    <license>
>          <p>
>          </p>
>    <licence>
>    <p></p>
>
> in an interleavy sort of way, but what the heck, its no worse than many another thing.
>
> would it be ok for leave this until the end of the week, and I implement it then if
> no-one has raised further objections?

At present, the P5 build fails because licence is inaccessible, so 
according to the (unwritten) rule book, someone should either do the 
implementation a bit sooner than the end of the week, or revert the 
addition of licence. Martin was looking at this earlier so maybe he'd 
like to comment? Implementation is just a matter of adding the new 
class, and adding licence to it.