[tei-council] Statement

[Gabriel Bodard]

I agree that we should go ahead and post this as soon as we have 
agreement of everyone on the wording (especially those who were not able 
to participate in the skypecon). If that means we release our statement 
sooner than the Board do theirs, then, well...

G

On 2011-08-17 16:55, Martin Holmes wrote:
> In that case, do you still think we should hold off on releasing our
> statement? I rather think it would be good for something to emerge soon.
> We could even say "the events that will be described
> in the Board's upcoming statement".
>
> On 11-08-17 08:50 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> Yeah, for some value of xx....
>>
>> Latest word is that it won't be before the end of the week.
>>
>>
>> On 17/08/11 16:42, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>> When the board issues its statement, we could say "the events described
>>> in the Board's statement of 2011-08-xx".
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 11-08-17 08:24 AM, Brett Barney wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, the wording of #4 is problematic. I'd suggest something like:
>>>>
>>>> 4) We believe that the events of the past week have caused a real harm to
>>>> the TEI Consortium and wish to know the Board's plans for restoring the
>>>> Consortium's reputation and good standing in the community.
>>>>
>>>> Though some may think "the events of the past week" is too vague.
>>>>
>>>> Brett
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> |------------>
>>>> | From:      |
>>>> |------------>
>>>>       >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>>       |Lou Burnard<lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>                                                                                                            |
>>>>       >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |------------>
>>>> | To:        |
>>>> |------------>
>>>>       >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>>       |tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU                                                                                                            |
>>>>       >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |------------>
>>>> | Date:      |
>>>> |------------>
>>>>       >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>>       |08/17/2011 10:14 AM                                                                                                                               |
>>>>       >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |------------>
>>>> | Subject:   |
>>>> |------------>
>>>>       >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>>       |Re: [tei-council] Statement                                                                                                                       |
>>>>       >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "to is reputation" ->     "to its reputation"
>>>>
>>>> On 17/08/11 15:55, Laurent Romary wrote:
>>>>> Council,
>>>>>
>>>>> Following our discussion, here's a new wording of our statement. Could we
>>>> get consensus on this so that I put it on the TEI + board list?
>>>>>
>>>>> Laurent
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) The TEI Technical Council continues to function and wants to get on
>>>> with its job of improving and openly maintaining the Guidelines and
>>>> associated systems and resources on behalf of the TEI Community.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) The TEI Technical Council is shocked and saddened by the sudden
>>>> actions of the TEI Board in dismissing its chair and the implications this
>>>> may have for the ability of the TEI Board to work effectively as
>>>> representatives of the TEI Community.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) We desire a greater transparency and accountability in TEI Board
>>>> activities, in addition to the minutes of meetings it already publishes,
>>>> and would support reforms that introduced mechanisms making TEI Board
>>>> activities more transparent and introduced greater consultation with the
>>>> TEI Community.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4) We wish to know what plans the TEI Board has to rescue the TEI
>>>> Consortium from what we perceive to be real harm to is reputation and good
>>>> standing in the community that this incident has caused.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> tei-council mailing list
>>>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>>>
>>>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> tei-council mailing list
>>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>>
>>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>> .
>>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/