[tei-council] Statement

[Martin Holmes]

In that case, do you still think we should hold off on releasing our 
statement? I rather think it would be good for something to emerge soon. 
We could even say "the events that will be described
in the Board's upcoming statement".

On 11-08-17 08:50 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> Yeah, for some value of xx....
>
> Latest word is that it won't be before the end of the week.
>
>
> On 17/08/11 16:42, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> When the board issues its statement, we could say "the events described
>> in the Board's statement of 2011-08-xx".
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>> On 11-08-17 08:24 AM, Brett Barney wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, the wording of #4 is problematic. I'd suggest something like:
>>>
>>> 4) We believe that the events of the past week have caused a real harm to
>>> the TEI Consortium and wish to know the Board's plans for restoring the
>>> Consortium's reputation and good standing in the community.
>>>
>>> Though some may think "the events of the past week" is too vague.
>>>
>>> Brett
>>>
>>>
>>> |------------>
>>> | From:      |
>>> |------------>
>>>      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>      |Lou Burnard<lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>                                                                                                           |
>>>      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>> |------------>
>>> | To:        |
>>> |------------>
>>>      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>      |tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU                                                                                                            |
>>>      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>> |------------>
>>> | Date:      |
>>> |------------>
>>>      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>      |08/17/2011 10:14 AM                                                                                                                               |
>>>      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>> |------------>
>>> | Subject:   |
>>> |------------>
>>>      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>      |Re: [tei-council] Statement                                                                                                                       |
>>>      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "to is reputation" ->    "to its reputation"
>>>
>>> On 17/08/11 15:55, Laurent Romary wrote:
>>>> Council,
>>>>
>>>> Following our discussion, here's a new wording of our statement. Could we
>>> get consensus on this so that I put it on the TEI + board list?
>>>>
>>>> Laurent
>>>>
>>>> 1) The TEI Technical Council continues to function and wants to get on
>>> with its job of improving and openly maintaining the Guidelines and
>>> associated systems and resources on behalf of the TEI Community.
>>>>
>>>> 2) The TEI Technical Council is shocked and saddened by the sudden
>>> actions of the TEI Board in dismissing its chair and the implications this
>>> may have for the ability of the TEI Board to work effectively as
>>> representatives of the TEI Community.
>>>>
>>>> 3) We desire a greater transparency and accountability in TEI Board
>>> activities, in addition to the minutes of meetings it already publishes,
>>> and would support reforms that introduced mechanisms making TEI Board
>>> activities more transparent and introduced greater consultation with the
>>> TEI Community.
>>>>
>>>> 4) We wish to know what plans the TEI Board has to rescue the TEI
>>> Consortium from what we perceive to be real harm to is reputation and good
>>> standing in the community that this incident has caused.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> tei-council mailing list
>>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>>
>>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tei-council mailing list
>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>
>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
> .
>

-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)