[tei-council] is TEI Lite defined by inclusion or exception?

James Cummings james.cummings at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Sat Mar 26 14:33:39 EDT 2011

My vote would be for it only to include what it currently includes. Things should only be consciously added to it rather than them getting it as a side effect.


James Cummings, InfoDev, OUCS, University of Oxford (from phone)

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Rahtz [sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk]
Received: Saturday, 26 Mar 2011, 14:29
To: TEI Council [tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU]
Subject: [tei-council] is TEI Lite defined by inclusion or exception?

It's clear that TEI Tite  should be expressed in terms of what _is_ in it, not by what is _not_.

How about Lite? when a new element is added to P5, should it appear in Lite?

The hot money is on Lite being an _inclusion_ ODD, but seems worth seeing whether anyone
feels strongly the other way.
Sebastian Rahtz
Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente

tei-council mailing list
tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

More information about the tei-council mailing list