[tei-council] is TEI Lite defined by inclusion or exception?

[James Cummings]

My vote would be for it only to include what it currently includes. Things should only be consciously added to it rather than them getting it as a side effect.

-James


James Cummings, InfoDev, OUCS, University of Oxford (from phone)

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Rahtz [sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk]
Received: Saturday, 26 Mar 2011, 14:29
To: TEI Council [tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU]
Subject: [tei-council] is TEI Lite defined by inclusion or exception?

It's clear that TEI Tite  should be expressed in terms of what _is_ in it, not by what is _not_.

How about Lite? when a new element is added to P5, should it appear in Lite?

The hot money is on Lite being an _inclusion_ ODD, but seems worth seeing whether anyone
feels strongly the other way.
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente






_______________________________________________
tei-council mailing list
tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived