[tei-council] Fwd: [ tei-Bugs-2714682 ] biblScope should be in Imprint or not? (biblStruct)
kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info
Sun Mar 20 09:36:01 EDT 2011
Could someone please reopen this ticket (and put it in the red category)
so that further work can take place on it?
On 3/13/11 4:00 AM, Laurent Romary wrote:
> Agree. We should just avoid using a category that automatically closes
> the ticket. We have the category "red" for tickets that remain to be
> discussed in depth.
> So let's leave open, but red.
> Le 12 mars 11 à 22:29, Kevin Hawkins a écrit :
>> If we leave it "closed", people will think it's been forgotten, and
>> there's a chance (though unlikely with Martin and me interested in it)
>> that it will actually be forgotten. If we set it to "postponed" again",
>> sf-robot will close it again. Right?
>> On 3/12/11 4:17 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>> Happy to reopen the ticket if you like, but since the last comment on it
>>> says unequivocally "we recommend that this ticket be set aside for the
>>> moment", I cant help wondering why?
>>> tei-council mailing list
>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
> Laurent Romary
> INRIA & HUB-IDSL
> laurent.romary at inria.fr
More information about the tei-council