[tei-council] Tite ticket - pb at facs

[Laurent Romary]

I think there is a consensus on the strategy there. We should let  
Kevin implement at his best.

Le 24 févr. 11 à 12:11, James Cummings a écrit :

>
> Aside from the slightly poorly-expressed caveat that I added to
> the ticket (and Kevin agreed with) that he should make _only_
> tei:pb a member of att.global.facs (or clone the @facs attribute)
> and not add membership for any *other* element.  (I've not looked
> at the Tite source to see whether he can indeed use the class or
> has to define @facs separately for pb.) The point being though
> that Tite should be kept as tight as possible.
>
> -James
>
>
> On 24/02/11 08:03, Laurent Romary wrote:
>> After an iteration for clarification. A simple change in Tite is
>> suggested here. I would suggest just to move ahead and let Kevin
>> implement.
>> Anyone wants to shout?
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=644065&aid=3136936&group_id=106328
>>
>> Laurent Romary
>> INRIA&  HUB-IDSL
>> laurent.romary at inria.fr
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>
>
> -- 
> Dr James Cummings, InfoDev,
> Computing Services, University of Oxford
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr