[tei-council] An easy ticket

[Gabriel Bodard]

I find myself agreeing with James both with respect to his 
rationalization and his conclusion.

+1 to swift implementation of this.

G

On 23/02/2011 09:55, James Cummings wrote:
>
> I fully support adding more things to att.typed whenever they are
> repeatable inside a parent container _and_ reasonably have some
> need for such categorisation. I recognise that others may have
> stricter criteria by which to limit the proliferation of
> att.typed, but<collection>  certainly meets my own criteria. So,
> I vote yes.
>
> -James
>
> On 23/02/11 09:42, Laurent Romary wrote:
>> Then go. It's a no-brainer.
>>
>> Le 23 févr. 11 à 10:40, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> On 23 Feb 2011, at 09:32, Laurent Romary wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks so simple that if Lou could implement this quickly we may as
>>>> well have this as a gift to Thorsten: Lou?
>>>
>>>
>>> it takes about 30 seconds to add<collection>   to att.typed if thats
>>> all thats required...
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Rahtz
>>> Information and Support Group Manager
>>> Oxford University Computing Services
>>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>>
>>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>>>
>>
>> Laurent Romary
>> INRIA&   HUB-IDSL
>> laurent.romary at inria.fr
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/