[tei-council] att.global discussion

[Laurent Romary]

Modulo the cosmetic changes, it seems all set. I have not heard any  
strong voices against this move, even counter arguments were more  
devil's advocate-like.
Since it is quite a big (but essential architectural moves), let us  
give until Monday night for the council to react.
Please make clear when you express your opinion or just comment on the  
issue.
Laurent


Le 11 févr. 11 à 19:18, James Cummings a écrit :

> On 11/02/11 18:09, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> Does anyone disagree that the discussion on TEI-L gives us a  
>> mandate to make the
>> att.global change?
>>
>> folks might like to compare
>> (new)
>> http://bits.nsms.ox.ac.uk:8080/jenkins/job/TEIP5-Release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-msIdentifier.html
>> with (old)
>> http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-msIdentifier.html
>> to see (one) effect of the change
>>
>> obviously I need to the change the label "In addition to global  
>> attributes"
>
> Do all elements get all global attribute subclasses in this new
> method. I.e. att.global.analytic?  Or do they get these classes
> but they aren't populated until I do <moduleRef
> name="att.global.analytic"/> or include the analysis module in my
> odd?
>
> Just double checking.
>
> -James
>
> -- 
> Dr James Cummings, Research Technologies Service
> OUCS, University of Oxford
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr