[tei-council] Roma, ODD-processing in XSLT 1.0

[James Cummings]

On 31/01/11 18:29, stuart yeates wrote:
> I have in the past been an advocate / holdout for XSLT 1.0 on the basis
> that XSLT 2.0 has only a single implementation and that ties us to the a
> particular tool chain.
>
> However, I'm now using XSLT 2.0 for a number of things and have found
> the world hasn't ended. So I'll not be objecting.


Just to note (as Sebastian already has done, but incorrectly) that there 
*are* _more_ than two implementations of XSLT 2.0 processors (with more 
on the way).

Michael Kay (and he should know) notes some of them in this mailing list 
post:
http://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/archives/201005/msg00031.html

namely, Saxon, Altova, IBM Websphere, Intel SOA Expressway, Gestalt, and 
notes back in last May that Marklogic were announcing one soon.

http://expath.org/wiki/Engines

notes some more but these are through including processors like saxon in 
the framework... though it mentions XQSharp which provides another .Net 
XSLT2 framework, I believe.

-James

-- 
Dr James Cummings
Research Technologies Service, University of Oxford